[NEWS] Basquiat NFT Withdrawn from Auction After Sparking Controversy


April 29, 2021 


Jean-Michel Basquiat's Free Comb with Pagoda (1986) Image: DaystromNFT 





During the recent NFT gold rush that’s seen artists and auction houses absolutely clean up, many other would-be entrepreneurs and innovators have attempted to it on the craze with creations like NFT versions of limited-edition coffee table books and Academy Awards ceremony gift bag items. Recently, an NFT version of the artist Jean-Michel Basquiat’s 1986 mixed media work on paper Free Comb with Pagoda appeared for sale on the platform OpenSea. However, an NFT of a drawing by Jean-Michel Basquiat has been withdrawn from auction after it was discovered that the seller did not possess the license or rights to the work, The Art Newspaperreports. After the firm Daystrom listed Free Comb with Pagoda, 1986, for sale on the OpenSea platform and offered the purchaser the option of destroying the original, physical work, Basquiat’s estate stepped in.




Jean-Michel Basquiat paints in 1983 in St. Moritz, Switzerland. Photo Credit: Lee Jaffe/Getty Images 



The estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat owns the copyright in the artwork referenced,” said estate representative David Stark. “No license or rights were conveyed to the seller and the NFT has subsequently been removed from sale.”
Il orologi replica rolex italia prezzo è conveniente.

Gli orologi di lusso repliche perfette a prezzi convenienti valgono la pena!

 

The estate did not specifically address whether it believes the drawing to be genuine or fake, though Daystrom says Free Comb with Pagoda was authenticated by Basquiat’s estate in 2002 and the current owner has “proof of purchase and payment to substantiate exclusive ownership”. It was expected to fetch between $80,000 and $120,000, but failed to sell, and in 2015 was purchased privately via a Philadelphia gallery for an undisclosed amount.




Jean-Michel Basquiat. Photo Credit: Patrick McMullan/Getty Images  





Daystrom, the firm behind the 2000 launch of David Bowie’s online bank, had offered “reproduction and IP rights that will be sold to the highest bidder in perpetuity.” The tender, paired with the offered chance for the new owner to destroy the original work, immediately raised questions regarding intellectual property rights—possession of an NFT, like that of a physical work, does not typically guarantee an owner copyright—as well as the specter of the artist’s moral rights.

 

When pressed on the copyright issue, Daystrom clarified: “While blockchain transactions are widely considered a trusted source of authentication and provenance, best copyright practices have yet to evolve for the digital economy.”





 


Prev [FAIRS] ZONAMACO MÉXICO ARTE CONTEMPORÁNEO
Next [FAIRS] Frieze New York 2021
  List